The Nature of Things

The Nature of Things

I want to take you somewhere before we go any further, because some of the practice in this series only makes sense once you have looked at what we are actually doing here.

It arrived on a Sunday.

That morning I visited my mother, who is seventy eight. She had fallen and gone face first into the sidewalk, and she was in a hospital bed, bruised and swollen, in terrible pain, completely helpless.

A few hours later I went to see my father, who is eighty four. His memory is fading quickly from Alzheimer's. I watched him walk slowly with his cane and I asked him what it feels like to age. He said, without a second of hesitation, "It sucks."

I have thought the same thing myself. Almost everyone who lives long enough gets hit with the same reality, that living a long time and aging are the same event. It is a difficult position that the Universe and biology have put us in.

I want to be careful here, because I am about to do two things and I do not want you to confuse them. One is to describe what appears to be happening. The other is to tell you what I believe it means. I am not going to pretend the meaning was lying on the ground waiting for me. I will show you my reasoning and you can decide what to do with it.

Start with what I see.

I see evolution as the means by which consciousness creates. Not a mind of its own, a method. It is how consciousness gets tried out in matter, slowly and badly, over and over, until something arrives that can look back at the process.

It is not efficient and it is not elegant. It needs enormous time and endless practice, and most of its attempts fail. That is what a method looks like when it has no blueprint and cannot see ahead.

Death is part of the method, and here is why I think it has to be.

Imagine one creature that could not die while everything else could. Given enough time, that creature consumes the field. It has no competition, no predator, no ceiling. And then you have a problem, because nothing is invincible. Even that creature would have a weakness, its own kryptonite, some pathogen or shift in conditions that finds it eventually. If it is the only living thing left when that arrives, life ends completely. All of it. There is no backup.

So the deathless lineage is the fragile one. Diversity is the insurance policy, and death is what keeps the field diverse enough to hold the policy. This is not evolution being clever. It is simpler than that. Systems with turnover persist. Systems without turnover are one bad day away from zero, and we would not be here discussing them.

The same principle scales all the way up. Nothing in this Universe gets to hold onto anything forever. Stars burn through their fuel. Mountains erode into rivers. Cells divide until they cannot. Species run their course. A parasite that killed every host would end itself along with them.

And if some object or force did grow without limit, if nothing ever came along to consume it or break it apart, it would eventually occupy all of space and time. Every other thing would be pulled in. Then you are left with one thing, and once there is only one thing there is nothing left for it to meet, nothing to act on, nothing to happen. The Universe would be static. Not silence. Not stillness. Simply no second party. Interaction requires more than one, so a Universe that permitted infinite accumulation would be a Universe that eventually shut itself down.

The ending of things is what keeps the material circulating. Every atom in you was previously something else, and it only became available to you because that something else came apart.

I sense the Universe is a manifestation of consciousness. I cannot define that in absolute terms and I distrust anyone who says they can. It is not striving the way a person strives, with plans and deadlines and a picture of the finished product. But it is moving toward something. It keeps producing life. It keeps producing order. And I notice that I am not describing a clock. A clock is built by someone to tell time to someone. The conscious Universe is like a clock maker. Trillions and trillions of clocks being made and eventually the clocks become conscious and think about the clock maker. The clock maker, the Universe, designed the intial pattern and over time it works. Here we are thinking about the Universe and creation. What we discover over our lifetime imporves the overall design and the overall awareness.

The obvious objection is that the Universe is running down overall, and that is true. Entropy wins the long game. What interests me is that inside the running down, more intricate arrangements keep appearing anyway, and eventually some of them wake up. That is the part I cannot make ordinary.

So this is where I land. Life is consciousness observing itself, and death is the expiration date that keeps the observing fresh and the observers many. Without an ending, everything would eventually be one thing, bored out of its mind, with nothing to meet.

One more thing about death, and I mean it as a value and not as a description of nature. Our ending should come from time. It should arrive because we lived long enough for the body to finish, according to the will of the natural world. It should not come from war, from what we do to each other, or from our own hand. Nature sets the terms of how long we get. What happens inside those terms is ours, and that is a great deal more than people assume, because we can interrupt inherited instinct and change lifelong patterns. What we cannot do is negotiate the ending, and what we should not do is move it up.

So what are we here for in the middle.

We live out our time doing whatever improves the circumstances for the creatures here, ourselves included. That is it. That is the meaning and that is the purpose, as far as I can see it. Feed the collective.

Standing there watching my father with his cane, I thought, first you have to be lucky enough to reach old age, and if you get there, you had better be able to find gratitude for something.

Which brings me to why this belongs in a book about practice.

This is the primal fear buried in all of us, and there is no clean way through it. Die young and you skip the drama of aging, but you lose the life. That fact carries no weight once you are dead, but it is terrifying to sit with while you are alive. Make it to a ripe old age and you are eventually forced to slow down. Nature says, "You are not doing backflips off the pool house into the pool anymore. It is time to lay down."

Every stage asks you to adjust your mind to a body and a life that have changed. If you refuse the adjustment, you are left behind, confused, fearful, and depressed, still arguing with a version of yourself that no longer exists.

The adjustment is not a one time event. It happens at twenty five and at forty and at sixty and at eighty. Sitting is how you practice it. Every time you sit down and watch a thought arrive and let it pass without chasing it, you are rehearsing the same move, which is releasing a version of things you were holding onto. We practice on small things so that we have some skill left when the large ones come.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.